347797979
|
0521400
|
2024-10-01
|
500 KEHOE BLVD, CAROL STREAM, IL, 60188
|
|
Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2024-10-01
|
Emphasis |
L: ONE DOL, N: FALL, L: PIV, N: AMPUTATE
|
Case Closed |
2025-02-07
|
Related Activity
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1751908 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
2217680 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
|
347519084
|
0521400
|
2024-05-31
|
500 KEHOE BLVD, CAROL STREAM, IL, 60188
|
|
Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2024-05-31
|
Emphasis |
N: LEAD, N: PMETALS
|
Related Activity
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
1779797 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
2159174 |
Safety |
Yes |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
2217680 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
2205727 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100138 A |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
8067.0 |
Initial Penalty |
8067.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.138(a): General requirements. Employers shall select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands are exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasions; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes. On or about May 31, 2024, employees in the CRT and Frit Line were exposed to laceration hazards while sorting and picking contaminants from the CRT glass. The employer failed to select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands are exposed to hazards such as severe cuts or lacerations. Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c). |
|
Citation ID |
01002A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
11292.0 |
Initial Penalty |
11292.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): The employer shall assure that no employee is exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air (50 ug/m(3)) averaged over an 8-hour period. On or about July 17, 2024, an employee working in the CRT portion of the CRT/FRIT line was exposed to an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 79.6 ?g/m3 for lead, approximately 1.6 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 ?g/m3. The exposure level was calculated for the 360-minute sampling period, with a zero exposure increment for the unsampled period of 120 minutes. Abatement documentation is required in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.9(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01002B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 E01 I |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(i): Where any employee is exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit for more than 30 days per year, the employer shall implement engineering and work practice controls (including administrative controls) to reduce and maintain employee exposure to lead in accordance with the implementation schedule in Table I below, except to the extent that the employer can demonstrate that such controls are not feasible. Wherever the engineering and work practice controls which can be instituted are not sufficient to reduce employee exposure to or below the permissible exposure limit, the employer shall nonetheless use them to reduce exposures to the lowest feasible level and shall supplement them by the use of respiratory protection which complies with the requirements of paragraph (f) of this section. On or about July 17, 2024, an employee working in the CRT portion of the CRT/FRIT line was exposed to an 8-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 79.6 ?g/m3 for lead, approximately 1.6 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 ?g/m3. The employer did not implement engineering or work practice controls to reduce the employee's exposure to lead below the PEL. Abatement documentation is required in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.9(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01003A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 E02 |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
11292.0 |
Initial Penalty |
11292.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(2): Respiratory protection was not provided to supplement engineering and work practice controls, that did not control employees exposure to or below 50 micrograms per meter cubed: On or about July 17, 2024, the employer did not ensure employees overexposed to airborne levels of lead above OSHA'S Permissible Exposure Limit of 50 micrograms per meter cube when working in the CRT portion of the CRT/FRIT Line were provided with respiratory protection. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d) |
|
Citation ID |
01003B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 F02 I |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(f)(2)(i): The employer must implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with � 1910.134(b) through (d) (except (d)(1)(iii)), and (f) through (m), which covers each employee required by 29 CFR 1910.1025 to use a respirator: On or about July 17, 2024, employees on the CRT portion of the line were exposed to lead dust in excess of the permissible exposure limit. The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program as required in accordance with 1910.134(b) through (d) (except (d)(1)(iii), and (f) through (m), which covers each employee required by 29 CFR 1910.1025 to use a respirator. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01004 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 D01 II |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Current Penalty |
11292.0 |
Initial Penalty |
11292.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
3 |
Nr Exposed |
7 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(1)(ii): With the exception of monitoring under paragraph (d)(3), the employer shall collect full shift (for at least 7 continuous hours) personal samples including at least one sample for each shift for each job classification in each work area. On or about July 17, 2024, employees in the shredder, CRT dismantling, and CRT/Frit line were exposed to lead dust. The employer failed to conduct personal full shift sampling for at least one employee for each shift or each job classification in each work area. This item was corrected during inspection. |
|
Citation ID |
01005 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 E03 I |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
11292.0 |
Initial Penalty |
11292.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program to reduce exposures to or below the permissible exposure limit, solely by means of engineering and work practice controls: On or about July 17, 2024, an employee was overexposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit in the CRT portion of the CRT/Frit line. The employer failed to establish and implement a written compliance program to reduce exposures to or below the permissible exposure limit, solely by means of engineering and work practice controls. Abatement documentation is required in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.9(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01006A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 G01 |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
11292.0 |
Initial Penalty |
11292.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(g)(1): Appropriate protective work clothing and equipment was not provided when employee(s) were exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, or where the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists: On or about July 17, 2024, employees working in the CRT portion of the CRT/FRIT line were exposed to a lead dust concentration in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL). The employer failed to provide appropriate protective work clothing such as coveralls, and shoe coverlets, when exposed to lead over the permissible exposure limit. Abatement documentation is required in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), |
|
Citation ID |
01006B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 G02 II |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(g)(2)(ii): The employer did not provide for the cleaning, laundering, or disposal of protective clothing and equipment against lead: On or about July 17, 2024, employees working in the CRT portion of the CRT/FRIT line were exposed to a lead dust concentration in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL). The employer failed to provide for the cleaning, laundering, or disposal of protective clothing and equipment against lead. Abatement documentation is required in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), |
|
Citation ID |
01007A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 H02 I |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
11292.0 |
Initial Penalty |
11292.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(2)(i): Floors and other surfaces where lead accumulates may not be cleaned by the use of compressed air. On or about May 30, 2024, employees were exposed to health hazards associated with lead in the CRT/FRIT Line. The Employer failed to ensure that compressed air was not used to clean debris during and at the end of the work shifts. Abatement documentation is required in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01007B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 H02 II |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(2)(ii): Shoveling, sweeping or brushing methods were used to remove lead accumulations where vacuuming or other equally effective methods were available and feasible. On or about May 30, 2024, employees were exposed to health hazards associated with lead in the CRT/FRIT Line. The Employer failed to ensure that shoveling, sweeping, or brushing methods were not used to remove lead accumulations where vacuuming or other equally effective methods were available and feasible. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance to 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01008A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I02 II |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
11292.0 |
Initial Penalty |
11292.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(2)(ii): The employer shall assure that change rooms are equipped with separate storage facilities for protective work clothing and equipment and for street clothes which prevent cross-contamination. On or about July 17, 2024, employees in the CRT portion of the CRT/FRIT line were exposed to a lead dust concentration in excess of the Permissible Exposure Limit. The employer failed to assure that change rooms were equipped with separate storage facilities for protective work clothing and equipment and for street clothes which prevent cross-contamination. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01008B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I03 I |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(i): Employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, were not required to shower at the end of the work shift: On or about July 17, 2024, employees in the CRT/FRIT line specifically the CRT area were exposed to a lead dust concentration in excess of the Permissible Exposure Limit. The employer failed to require employees to shower at the end of the work shift. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01008C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I03 II |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(ii):The employer shall provide shower facilities in accordance with 1910.141 (d)(3) of this part. On or about July 17, 2024, employees in the CRT/FRIT line specifically the CRT area were exposed to a lead dust concentration in excess of the Permissible Exposure Limit. The employer failed to provide shower facilities to employees. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01008D |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I04 III |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(4)(iii): The employer shall assure that employees who work in areas where their airborne exposure to lead is above the PEL without regard to the use of a respirator wash their hands and face prior to eating, drinking, smoking or applying cosmetics. On or about May 31, 2024, employees in the CRT/FRIT line specifically the CRT area were exposed to a lead dust concentration in excess of the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL). The employer failed to assure that employees who work in areas where their airborne exposure to lead is above the PEL without regard to the use of a respirator wash their hands and face prior to eating, drinking, smoking or applying cosmetics. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01008E |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I04 IV |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(4)(iv): Employees entering lunchroom facilities with protective work clothing or equipment were not required to remove surface lead dust by vacuuming, downdraft booth, or other cleaning method(s): On or about July 17, 2024, employees entering lunchroom facilities with protective work clothing or equipment were not required to remove surface lead dust by vacuuming, downdraft booth, or other cleaning method(s). Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance to 29 CFR 1903.19(d) |
|
Citation ID |
01009 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 J03 I B |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
11292.0 |
Initial Penalty |
11292.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(3)(i)(B): Medical examinations and consultations for lead were not performed prior to assignment for each employee being assigned for the first time to an area in which airborne concentrations of lead are at or above the action level: a. On or about July 17, 2024, an employee working on the CRT portion of the CRT/FRIT LINE was exposed to a lead dust concentration in excess of the permissible exposure limit. The employer did not ensure that all medical examinations and consultations for lead were performed prior to assignment for each employee being assigned for the first time to an area which airborne concentrations of lead are at or above the action level. b. On or about July 17, 2024, an employee working on the FRIT portion of the CRT/FRIT LINE was exposed to lead dust above the action level. The employer did not ensure that all medical examinations and consultations for lead were performed prior to assignment for each employee being assigned for the first time to an area which airborne concentrations of lead are at or above the action level. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01010 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 M02 I |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
11292.0 |
Initial Penalty |
11292.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
4 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(2)(i): The employer shall post the following warning signs in each work area where the PEL is exceeded: On or about July 17, 2024, an employee in the CRT portion of the CRT/FRIT line was exposed to a lead dust concentration in excess of the Permissible Exposure Limit. The employer failed to post the required signage in the CRT/FRIT line. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01011A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 L01 II |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
11292.0 |
Initial Penalty |
11292.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
8 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(ii):The employer did not train each employee who is subject to exposure to lead at or above the action level, or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists, in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1025: a. On or about May 31, 2024, the employees working on the CRT dismantler were removing the plastic from the computers and televisions. Employees were exposed to respiratory health hazards such as lead. The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to lead at or above the action level or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists in accordance with the requirement of 29 CFR 1910.1025. b. On or about May 31, 2024, the employees working on the CRT/FRIT line were crushing glass coming from the crusher using a hammer. Employees were exposed to respiratory health hazards such as lead dust. The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to lead at or above the action level or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists in accordance with the requirement of 29 CFR 1910.1025. |
|
Citation ID |
01011B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
Issuance Date |
2024-11-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2024-12-20 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Contest Date |
2024-12-09 |
Nr Instances |
2 |
Nr Exposed |
8 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area: a. On or about May 31, 2024, the employees working in the CRT dismantler were removing the plastic from the computers and televisions. Employees were exposed to respiratory health hazards such as lead. The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work are at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area. b. On or about May 31, 2024, the employees working in the CRT/FRIT line were crushing glass coming from the crusher using a hammer. Employees were exposed to respiratory health hazards such as lead dust. The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work are at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area. |
|
|
341852465
|
0521400
|
2016-10-18
|
140 FULLERTON AVE., CAROL STREAM, IL, 60188
|
|
Inspection Type |
Referral
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2016-10-18
|
Emphasis |
L: PIV
|
Case Closed |
2018-10-19
|
Related Activity
Type |
Referral |
Activity Nr |
1145467 |
Safety |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Repeat |
Standard Cited |
19100176 B |
Issuance Date |
2016-12-15 |
Abatement Due Date |
2017-01-23 |
Current Penalty |
6000.0 |
Initial Penalty |
10974.0 |
Final Order |
2017-01-12 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
20 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Referral |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure against sliding and collapse: On or about October 18, 2016 employees in the warehouse were exposed to sliding and collapsing stacks of palletized loads of electronic equipment while performing maintenance and warehouse operations, and the employer failed to effectively secure the material in a stable and secure manner. Abatement documentation is required in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). COM2 Computers and Technologies, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.176(b), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 329259, citation 1, Item 2 and was affirmed as a final order on October 18, 2012, with respect to a workplace located at 140 Fullerton Ave., Carol Stream, IL 60188. |
|
|
339635724
|
0521400
|
2014-03-18
|
140 FULLERTON AVENUE, SUITE A, CAROL STREAM, IL, 60188
|
|
Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2014-05-07
|
Emphasis |
N: LEAD
|
Case Closed |
2014-05-09
|
Related Activity
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
874816 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
965453 |
Health |
Yes |
|
|
339501421
|
0524500
|
2013-12-02
|
777 WINDSOR DR, CHARLESTON, IL, 61920
|
|
Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Safety
|
Close Conference |
2013-12-02
|
Emphasis |
L: PIV
|
Case Closed |
2014-12-31
|
Related Activity
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
862963 |
Safety |
Yes |
Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001A |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100178 L01 I |
Issuance Date |
2014-02-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-02-26 |
Current Penalty |
1000.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3600.0 |
Final Order |
2014-03-11 |
Nr Instances |
3 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l). The employer did not ensure that each operator had completed training that included all the topics listed in the standard and completed an evaluation of the operators performance through practical exercises prior to allowing employees to operate the forklift to move materials throughout the facility and to load and unload trucks, thereby exposing employees to struck-by and crush-by hazards. |
|
Citation ID |
01001B |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100178 L06 |
Issuance Date |
2014-02-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-02-26 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2014-03-11 |
Nr Instances |
3 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l). The employer did not certify that each operator had completed training that included all the topics listed in the standard and completed an evaluation of the operators performance through practical exercises prior to allowing employees to operate the forklift to move materials throughout the facility and to load and unload trucks, thereby exposing employees to struck-by and crush-by hazards. |
|
Citation ID |
01001C |
Citaton Type |
Other |
Standard Cited |
19100178 Q07 |
Issuance Date |
2014-02-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-02-20 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2014-03-11 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service. Employees were exposed to injury while operating a Toyota LPG forklift to move materials throughout the facility and to load and unload trucks because it was not being examined before being placed into service to identify conditions that could affect its safe operation. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100305 B02 I |
Issuance Date |
2014-02-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-02-20 |
Current Penalty |
1800.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3600.0 |
Final Order |
2014-03-11 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose. Employees were exposed to electrical hazards because an electrical outlet located in the warehouse loading area was not equipped with a suitable cover. |
|
Citation ID |
01003 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
Issuance Date |
2014-02-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-02-26 |
Current Penalty |
2520.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3600.0 |
Final Order |
2014-03-11 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met. Employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals such as propane and a written hazard communication program had not been implemented and documented as required by the standard. |
|
Citation ID |
02001 |
Citaton Type |
Repeat |
Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
Issuance Date |
2014-02-13 |
Abatement Due Date |
2014-02-26 |
Current Penalty |
180.0 |
Initial Penalty |
180.0 |
Final Order |
2014-03-11 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
3 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area. Employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals such as propane and a hazard communication training had not been provided to employees as required by the standard. COM2 Computers and Technologies, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.1200(h)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 329259, citation number 1, item number 11 c and was affirmed as a final order on 10/16/12, with respect to a workplace location at 140 Fullerton Ave, Carol Stream, IL. |
|
|
339304248
|
0521400
|
2013-08-15
|
140 FULLERTON AVE., CAROL STREAM, IL, 60188
|
|
Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2013-08-15
|
Emphasis |
N: LEAD
|
Case Closed |
2013-12-19
|
Related Activity
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
840232 |
Safety |
Yes |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
931703 |
Health |
Yes |
|
|
338967276
|
0521400
|
2013-03-20
|
140 FULLERTON AVE., CAROL STREAM, IL, 60188
|
|
Inspection Type |
FollowUp
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2013-03-20
|
Emphasis |
N: LEAD
|
Case Closed |
2013-04-04
|
Related Activity
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
329259 |
Health |
Yes |
|
|
333292597
|
0521400
|
2012-03-30
|
140 FULLERTON AVE., CAROL STREAM, IL, 60188
|
|
Inspection Type |
Complaint
|
Scope |
Partial
|
Safety/Health |
Health
|
Close Conference |
2012-03-30
|
Emphasis |
L: PIV
|
Case Closed |
2013-03-13
|
Related Activity
Type |
Complaint |
Activity Nr |
219604 |
Safety |
Yes |
Health |
Yes |
|
Type |
Inspection |
Activity Nr |
332110 |
Health |
Yes |
|
Violation Items
Citation ID |
01001 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100135 A01 |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Current Penalty |
1485.0 |
Initial Penalty |
2970.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee wore a protective helmet when working in areas where there was a potential for injury to the head from falling objects: On or about March 30, 2012, an employee in the Glass Crush Unit Area was exposed to head injuries from falling sections of glass from broken CRT screens while performing Glass Crush Unit operations and from sliding monitors in the storage areas when shrink wrap was damaged. The employer failed to enforce the use of hard hats. No abatement documentation or certification is required for this item. |
|
Citation ID |
01002 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100176 B |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-10-17 |
Current Penalty |
1980.0 |
Initial Penalty |
3960.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure against sliding and collapse: On or about April 10, 2012, employees in the warehouse were exposed to sliding and collapsing stacks of palletized loads of electronic equipment while performing maintenance and warehouse operations, and the employer failed to effectively secure the material in a stable and secure manner. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01003 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19100212 A01 |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-10-17 |
Current Penalty |
2475.0 |
Initial Penalty |
4950.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
1 |
Gravity |
5 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about April 10, 2012, an employee in Glass Crush Unit Area was exposed to crush injuries from ingoing nip points while performing unloading operations, and the employer failed to provide machine guarding. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01004A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 C01 |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-03-21 |
Current Penalty |
3465.0 |
Initial Penalty |
6930.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
5 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1): Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period: a. On or about April 10, 2012, a glass sorter was exposed to lead dust above the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) at an eight hour Time Weighted Average exposure level of 61.51 micrograms per meter cubed, approximately 1.23 times the limit of 50 micrograms per meter cubed. This limit was established to prevent employees from suffering from adverse health effects such as central nervous system, urinary or reproductive damage. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01004B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 E01 I |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-03-21 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(1)(i): For any employees exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit for more than 30 days per year the employer did not implement engineering and work practice controls (including administrative controls) were not implemented to reduce and maintain employee exposure to lead: a. On or about April 10, 2012, a glass sorter was exposed to lead dust above the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) at an eight hour Time Weighted Average exposure level of 61.51 micrograms per meter cubed, approximately 1.23 times the limit of 50 micrograms per meter cubed. This limit was established to prevent employees from suffering from adverse health effects such as central nervous system, urinary or reproductive damage. The employer did not implement engineering or workpractice controls to reduce the employee's exposure to lead below the PEL. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01004C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 E03 I |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-03-21 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program to reduce exposures to or below the permissible exposure limit, solely by means of engineering and work practice controls: On or about April 10, 2012, an employee in the glass sort line was exposed to lead 1.23 times the PEL. The employer did not establish and/or implement a compliance program to reduce lead exposures to or below the PEL. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01004D |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 F02 I |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2013-03-21 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(f)(2)(i): The employer did not implement a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134(b) through (d) (except (d)(1)(iii)), and (f) through (m) for each employee required by 29 CFR 1910.1025 to use a respirator: On or about April 10, 2012, an employee on the glass sort line was exposed to lead dust concentrations 1.23 times the Permissible Exposure Limit and the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program in place. The Permissible Exposure Limit was established to prevent employees from adverse health effects such as respiratory and kidney damage. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). Abatement: Step 1: Effective respiratory protection shall be provided and used by exposed employees as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering and/or administrative controls can be implemented, or whenever such controls fail to reduce employee exposure to within permissible exposure limits. Step 2: A written detailed plan of abatement shall be submitted to the Area Director outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee exposure to hazardous substances as referenced in this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation. 1. Evaluation of engineering/administrative control options; 2. Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design; 3. Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures; 4. Testing and acceptance or modification/redesign of controls. All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use by a competent industrial hygienist or other technically qualified person. 90-day progress reports are required during the abatement period. Step 3: Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering controls and/or administrative controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance. Date by which Step 1 must be abated: 00/00/00 Date by which Step 2 must be abated: 00/00/00 Date by which Step 3 must be abated: 00/00/00 |
|
Citation ID |
01004E |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 D01 II |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-10-17 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
6930.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(1)(ii): Full shift (for at least seven 7 continuous hours) personal samples for lead were not collected including at least one sample for each shift for each job classification in each work area: On or about April 10, 2012, glass sorting employees were exposed to lead dust levels above the PEL and the employer failed to perform employee personal eight hour time weighted average sampling. Additional abatement information is not required for this item. |
|
Citation ID |
01004F |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 D07 |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-10-17 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(7): Additional exposure monitoring was not conducted when there was a change in production, process, control or personnel, or any other reason to suspect a change that may have resulted in new or additional exposure to lead: On or about March 30, 2012, the employer had not performed additional personal employee air sampling for lead when the production facility was moved. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01006 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 G01 |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-10-17 |
Current Penalty |
3465.0 |
Initial Penalty |
6930.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(g)(1): Appropriate protective work clothing and equipment was not provided when employee(s) were exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, or where the possibility of skin or eye irritation existed: On or about April 10, 2012, an employee on the glass sort line was exposed to lead dust concentrations 1.23 times the Permissible Exposure Limit. The employee was not provided with and/or required to wear coveralls, shoe coverlets, and hats. Employees were allowed to work in their personal clothing on a daily basis. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01007A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I02 I |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-07 |
Current Penalty |
4330.0 |
Initial Penalty |
6930.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(2)(i): Clean change rooms were not provided for employees exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators: On or about April 10, 2012, an employee on the glass sort line was exposed to lead dust concentrations 1.23 times over the Permissible Exposure Limit. The employee was not provided with a clean change room. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01007B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I03 III |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-07 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(ii): Shower facilities, in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.141(d)(3), were not provided for employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators: On or about April 10, 2012, an employee on the glass sort line was exposed to lead dust concentrations 1.23 times over the PEL. The employee was not provided shower facilities. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01007C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I03 I |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-07 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(i): Employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, were not required to shower at the end of the work shift: On or about April 10, 2012, an employee on the glass sort line was exposed to lead dust concentrations 1.23 times over the PEL. The employee was not required to shower at the end of the work shift. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01007D |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I03 II |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-11-07 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(3)(ii): Shower facilities, in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.141(d)(3), were not provided for employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators: On or about April 10, 2012, an employee on the glass sort line was exposed to lead dust concentrations 1.23 times over the PEL. The employee was not provided shower facilities. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01008A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 H01 |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-09-26 |
Current Penalty |
4330.0 |
Initial Penalty |
6930.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: On or about April 10, 2012, lunch room area surfaces were not kept free from lead contamination. Wipe samples taken at surfaces in the lunchroom found lead present on both the eating surfaces as well as the lunch room fan. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01008B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 H02 I |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-09-26 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(2)(i): Floors and/or other surfaces where lead accumulates were cleaned by the use of compressed air: On or about April 10, 2012, employees used compressed air to clean the surfaces of the forklift used in the CRT Room. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01008C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 H02 II |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-09-26 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(2)(ii): Shoveling, sweeping or brushing methods were used to remove lead accumulations where vacuuming or other equally effective methods were available and feasible: On or about April 10, 2012, an employee on the glass sort line was exposed to lead dust 1.23 times above the Permissible Exposure Limit. Employees performed dry sweeping daily to remove dust containing lead from the floor. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01008D |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 I04 II |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-10-17 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
6930.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(i)(4)(ii): Lunchroom facilities for employee(s) exposed to lead in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), without regard to the use of respirators, were not provided with a temperature controlled, positive pressure and filtered air supply and were not readily accessible to employees: On or about April 30, 2012, an employee on the glass sort line was exposed to lead dust concentrations above the Permissible Exposure Limit. The lunch area provided by the employer was a wall partition next to the CRT Room without a ceiling. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01010 |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 J01 I |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-10-31 |
Current Penalty |
1730.0 |
Initial Penalty |
6930.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(j)(1)(i): A medical surveillance program was not instituted for all employee(s) who were, or could be exposed to lead above the action level for more that thirty days per year: On or about April 10, 2012, an employee on the glass sort line was exposed to lead dust concentrations 1.23 times over the Permissible Exposure Limit. The employer did not institute a medical surveillance program for all employees who were exposed to lead above the action level for 30 days or more a year. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01011A |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 L01 II |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-10-31 |
Current Penalty |
1740.0 |
Initial Penalty |
6930.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not train each employee who is subject to exposure to lead at or above the action level, or for whom the possibility of skin or eye irritation exists, in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1025: On or about April 10, 2012, an employee on the glass sort line was exposed to lead dust concentrations 1.23 times over the Permissible Exposure Limit. The employer did not institute a training program for employees exposed whenever eye and/or skin irritation could occur or to employees exposed above the action level. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01011B |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101025 M02 I |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-10-17 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
10 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(2)(i): Warning signs bearing the legend: WARNING, LEAD WORK AREA, POISON, NO SMOKING OR EATING, were not posted in each work area where the permissible exposure limit (PEL) was exceeded: On or about April 10, 2012, an employee on the glass sort line was exposed to lead dust concentrations 1.23 times over the Permissible Exposure Limit. The employer failed to post the required signage in the glass sort line area. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
Citation ID |
01011C |
Citaton Type |
Serious |
Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
Issuance Date |
2012-09-25 |
Abatement Due Date |
2012-10-31 |
Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
Final Order |
2012-10-16 |
Nr Instances |
1 |
Nr Exposed |
10 |
Related Event Code (REC) |
Complaint |
Gravity |
1 |
FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area On or about April 10, 2012, employees in CRT Room were exposed to metal dusts, zinc oxide, from glass crushing operations. The employer failed to provide effective training to the employees. Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). |
|
|