Home Page
Counties
Cook
60604
NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY

NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY

Company Details

Entity Name:	NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY
Jurisdiction:	Illinois
Entity Type:	Corporation - Foreign BCA
Status:	Goodstanding
Date Formed:	02 Jan 1914
Company Number:	CORP_01246305
File Number:	01246305
Place of Formation:	MISSOURI

Agent

Name and Address	Role	Appointment Date
C T CORPORATION SYSTEM, 208 SO LASALLE ST, SUITE 814, CHICAGO, 60604, COOK-NOT IN CITY OF CHICAGO	Agent	2002-06-04

President

Name and Address	Role
NINA LEIGH KRUEGER CHECKERBOARD SQUARE ST LOUIS MO 63164	President

Secretary

Name and Address	Role
TODD BURSKI	Secretary

Assumed Names

Name	Type	Effective Date	Cancellation Date	Cancellation Type	Last Renewal Date
GOLDEN PRODUCTS	No data	1999-02-26	2004-12-29	Expired	No data
RPCO	No data	1997-05-29	1999-02-26	Voluntary Cancellation	No data
PRO-VISIONS PET SPECIALTY ENTERPRISES	No data	1996-06-17	2004-12-29	Expired	No data
BEECH-NUT NUTRITION CORPORATION	No data	1990-01-02	1995-01-11	Voluntary Cancellation	No data

Historical Names

Name	Change Date
RALSTON PURINA COMPANY	2001-12-20

Class	Series	Voting Rights	Authorized Shares	Issued Shares	Par Value
COMMON	No data	Voting Rights	30000	1000000	1

Mines

Mine Name

Type

Status

Primary Sic

OLMSTED PLANT

Surface

Abandoned

Fire Clay

Parties

Name	Southern Clay-Div/Edward Lowe Industries Inc
Role	Operator
Start Date	1950-01-01
End Date	1991-01-22

Name	Golden Cat Corp
Role	Operator
Start Date	1991-01-23
End Date	1995-05-14

Name	Ralston Purina Company
Role	Operator
Start Date	1995-05-15

Name	Ralston Purina Company
Role	Current Controller
Start Date	1995-05-15

Name	Nestle Purina PetCare Co.
Role	Current Operator

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr

Report ID

Date Opened

Site Address

101335321

0524200

1987-07-01

121 SOUTH WILKE ROAD, ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL, 60005

Inspection Type	Planned
Scope	NoInspection
Safety/Health	Safety
Close Conference	1987-07-01
Case Closed	1987-07-06

Court Cases

Docket Number

Nature of Suit

Filing Date

Disposition

1100106

Civil Rights Employment

2011-02-08

settled

Circuit	Seventh Circuit
Origin	original proceeding
Jurisdiction	federal question
Jury Demand	Plaintiff demands jury
Demanded Amount	100000
Termination Class Action	Missing
Procedural Progress	other
Nature Of Judgment	no monetary award
Judgement	missing
Arbitration On Termination	Missing
Office	3
Filing Date	2011-02-08
Termination Date	2011-10-27
Section	1331
Sub Section	ED
Status	Terminated

Parties

Name	LEE
Role	Plaintiff

Name	NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY
Role	Defendant

2412206

Other Personal Property Damage

2024-11-26

missing

Circuit	Seventh Circuit
Origin	removed (began in the state court, removed to the district court)
Jurisdiction	diversity of citizenship
Jury Demand	Both plaintiff and defendant demand jury
Demanded Amount	75000
Termination Class Action	Missing
Procedural Progress	Missing
Nature Of Judgment	Missing
Judgement	missing
Arbitration On Termination	Missing
Office	1
Filing Date	2024-11-26
Termination Date	1900-01-01
Section	1446
Sub Section	PD
Status	Pending

Parties

Name	MOST
Role	Plaintiff

Name	NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY
Role	Defendant

0502302

Patent

2005-04-19

settled

Circuit	Seventh Circuit
Origin	original proceeding
Jurisdiction	federal question
Jury Demand	Missing
Demanded Amount	0
Termination Class Action	Missing
Procedural Progress	no court action
Nature Of Judgment	Missing
Judgement	missing
Arbitration On Termination	Missing
Office	1
Filing Date	2005-04-19
Termination Date	2005-10-13
Date Issue Joined	2005-06-20
Section	0145
Status	Terminated

Parties

Name	PSN ILLINIOIS, LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY
Role	Defendant

2303491

Other Personal Property Damage

2023-06-02

settled

Circuit	Seventh Circuit
Origin	removed (began in the state court, removed to the district court)
Jurisdiction	diversity of citizenship
Jury Demand	Defendant demands jury
Demanded Amount	> 10000$
Termination Class Action	Missing
Procedural Progress	no court action
Nature Of Judgment	no monetary award
Judgement	missing
Arbitration On Termination	Missing
Office	1
Filing Date	2023-06-02
Termination Date	2023-10-02
Section	1446
Sub Section	PD
Status	Terminated

Parties

Name	DALY
Role	Plaintiff

Name	NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY
Role	Defendant

1508138

Civil Rights Employment

2015-09-16

settled

Circuit	Seventh Circuit
Origin	original proceeding
Jurisdiction	federal question
Jury Demand	Both plaintiff and defendant demand jury
Demanded Amount	0
Termination Class Action	Missing
Procedural Progress	order entered
Nature Of Judgment	no monetary award
Judgement	missing
Arbitration On Termination	Missing
Office	1
Filing Date	2015-09-16
Termination Date	2015-11-20
Section	1981
Sub Section	JB
Status	Terminated

Parties

Name	O'BANION
Role	Plaintiff

Name	NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY
Role	Defendant

1609179

Patent

2016-09-23

settled

Circuit	Seventh Circuit
Origin	original proceeding
Jurisdiction	federal question
Jury Demand	Defendant demands jury
Demanded Amount	75000
Termination Class Action	Missing
Procedural Progress	other
Nature Of Judgment	no monetary award
Judgement	missing
Arbitration On Termination	Missing
Office	1
Filing Date	2016-09-23
Termination Date	2017-06-16
Date Issue Joined	2016-12-01
Section	0271
Status	Terminated

Parties

Name	OIL-DRI CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Role	Plaintiff

Name	NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY
Role	Defendant

Court Cases Opinions

Package ID

Category

Cause

Nature Of Suit

USCOURTS-ilnd-1_12-cv-02871

Judicial Publications

28:1331 Federal Question

Other Statutory Actions

Collection	United States Courts Opinions
SuDoc	JU 4.15
Court Type	District
Court Name	United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
Circuit	7th
Office Location	Chicago
Case Type	civil

Parties

Name	BJ's Wholesale Club Inc.
Role	Defendant

Name	Target Corporation
Role	Defendant

Name	CAREMARK PHC, L.L.C.
Role	Defendant

Name	CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Role	Defendant

Name	Caremark Advanced Technology Pharmacy LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Role	Defendant

Name	Does 1-10
Role	Defendant

Name	Does 1-20
Role	Defendant

Name	NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY
Role	Defendant

Name	Pet Supplies Plus of Connecticut XI LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	WALMART INC.
Role	Defendant

Name	Waggin' Train LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	WALGREEN CO.
Role	Defendant

Name	Dennis Adkins
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Tracy Bagatta
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Deborah Cowan
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Rita DeSollar
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Mary Ellen Deschamps
Role	Plaintiff

Name	MARY ELLIS, LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Rebel Ely
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Cindi Farkas
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Maria Higginbotham
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Jill Holbrook
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Dwayne Holley
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Kaiya Holley
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Kristina Irving
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Jeannie Johnson
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Kahleen Malone
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Elizabeth Mawaka
Role	Plaintiff

Name	S. Raymond Parker
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Barbara Pierpont
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Robin Pierre
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Terry Safranek
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Hal Scheer
Role	Plaintiff

Opinions

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_12-cv-02871-0
Date	2013-09-27
Notes	Memorandum Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman on 9/27/2013. Defendant BJ's motion to dismiss 100 for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied. Plaintiff's request for jurisdictional discovery is denied. Defendants' motion to dismiss 102 for failure to state a claim is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' motions to dismiss certain claims are granted. An amended complaint is due by 10/21/2013. Defendants' response is due by 11/12/2013. A joint status report is due by 11/14/2013. Status hearing set for 11/20/2013 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice (gds)
View	View File

USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637

Judicial Publications

28:1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)

Collection	United States Courts Opinions
SuDoc	JU 4.15
Court Type	District
Court Name	United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
Circuit	7th
Office Location	Chicago
Case Type	civil

Parties

Name	Mar-Jac Poultry
Role	Defendant

Name	TYSON FOODS, INC.
Role	Defendant

Name	Tyson Poultry
Role	Defendant

Name	UTRECHT-AMERICA FINANCE CO.
Role	Defendant

Name	Utrecht-America Finance Co.
Role	Defendant

Name	Utrecht-America Holdings
Role	Defendant

Name	Walnut Sycamore Holdings LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	United Food Service
Role	Movant

Name	CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY
Role	Plaintiff

Name	SANDERSON FARMS, LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	The Amick Company
Role	Defendant

Name	Walnut Sycamore Intermediate Holdings LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	Spartannash Company
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Margo Stack
Role	Plaintiff

Name	William E. Stack
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Pamela Tierney
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Timber Lake Foods
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Wal-Mart Property Co.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Save Mart Supermarkets
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Wal-Mart Louisiana
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Wal-Mart Stores East
Role	Plaintiff

Name	SCHNUCK MARKETS, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Wal-Mart Stores Texas
Role	Plaintiff

Name	David Weidner
Role	Plaintiff

Name	CMSC Poultry LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	John M. Andren
Role	Objector

Name	ALDI Inc
Role	Plaintiff

Name	ARCOP
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Action Meat Distributors
Role	Plaintiff

Name	AFFILIATED FOODS, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	GOLDEN CORRAL CORPORATION
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Natalie Wilbur
Role	Plaintiff

Name	CARGILL, INCORPORATED
Role	Defendant

Name	Tyson Chicken
Role	Defendant

Name	Perdue Farms
Role	Defendant

Name	Perdue Foods LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	Rabo AgriFinance LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	Rabo Agrifinance LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	Rabobank
Role	Defendant

Name	Rabobank USA Financial Corporation
Role	Defendant

Name	Sanderson Farm Foods
Role	Defendant

Name	Sanderson Farms Processing
Role	Defendant

Name	Sanderson Farms Production
Role	Defendant

Name	Gordon Food Service
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Mountainaire Farms of Delaware
Role	Defendant

Name	Amick Farms
Role	Defendant

Name	Amick-OSI Broilers
Role	Defendant

Name	Simmons Foods
Role	Defendant

Name	Sumner Country Restaurant and Creamery
Role	Plaintiff

Name	SUPERVALU INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Supply Management Services
Role	Plaintiff

Name	The Johnny Rockets Group
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Case Foods
Role	Defendant

Name	Claxton Poultry Farms
Role	Defendant

Name	CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY
Role	Defendant

Name	Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A.
Role	Defendant

Name	Equity Group Kentucky Division LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	Equity Group-Georgia Division LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	Fieldale Farms Corporation
Role	Defendant

Name	Foster Farms
Role	Defendant

Name	Foster Group Acquisition LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	Foster Group Parent LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	O.K. Farms
Role	Defendant

Name	Simmons Prepared Foods
Role	Defendant

Name	O.K. Foods
Role	Defendant

Name	Sycamore Buyer LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	Supply Management Services
Role	Movant

Name	Pacific Foods of Oregon
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Panda Restaurant Group
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Lester Patterson
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Patterson TMP Operating
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Alison Pauk
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Perkins LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Michael Perry
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Debra Piette
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distributing Co.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Pinnacle Foods
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Plaintiffs in 1:16-cv-08637
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Plaintiffs in related action 1:17-cv-08850
Role	Plaintiff

Name	POLLO OPERATIONS, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Poultry Products Company of New England
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Poultry Products Company
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Poultry Products of Maine
Role	Plaintiff

Name	PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	QUALITY SUPPLY CHAIN CO-OP, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	QUIRCH FOODS CO.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	R & D Marketing
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Rancho Bernardo Wings
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Red Bird Farms Distribution Company
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Restaurant Services
Role	Plaintiff

Name	RESTAURANTS OF AMERICA, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	SODEXO, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Sonic Industries Services Inc.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	South Gate Wings
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Marilyn Stangeland
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Steeple Down River Ltd
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Sullott Corporation
Role	Plaintiff

Name	ACR IV Foster Holdings LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	Case Farms
Role	Defendant

Name	Equity Group Eufaula Division LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	Foster Poultry Farms
Role	Defendant

Name	UTRECHT-AMERICA HOLDINGS
Role	Defendant

Name	Frank Coe
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Role	Plaintiff

Name	COMPASS GROUP USA, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Conagra Brands
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Costa Mesa Wings
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Kirk Evans
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Vern Peter Gardner
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Hamilton Meat
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Matthew Hayward
Role	Plaintiff

Name	HMC HOSPITALITY GROUP INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Howard Samuels as Trustee in Bankruptcy for Central Grocers
Role	Plaintiff

Name	HUDDLE HOUSE, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	HY-VEE, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
Role	Plaintiff

Name	JETRO HOLDINGS, LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	AFFILIATED FOODS, INC.
Role	Unknown

Name	Roger Born Austin
Role	Unknown

Name	Peco Foods
Role	Defendant

Name	Thurston Foods
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Ray Wieters
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
Role	Defendant

Name	Wakefern Food Corporation
Role	Plaintiff

Name	ACR III Foster Holdings LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Brookshire Brothers
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Brookshire Grocery Company
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Anaheim Wings
Role	Plaintiff

Name	ARAMARK FOOD AND SUPPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Associated Grocers of Florida
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Associated Grocers of New England
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Associated Grocers of the South
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Associated Grocers
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Associated Wholesale Grocers
Role	Plaintiff

Name	BJ's Wholesale Club Inc.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	BOJANGLES OPCO, LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	BOJANGLES' RESTAURANTS
Role	Plaintiff

Name	BARBEQUE INTEGRATED, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Barters International LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Bashas' Inc.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Bi-Lo Holdings
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Big Y Foods
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Biscuitville Inc.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Bob Evans Farms
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Bodega Brew Pub
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Bonita Plaza Wings
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Boston Market Corporation
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Cheryl Brenchley
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Buffalo Wild Wings
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Burford Capital Holdings (UK) Limited
Role	Plaintiff

Name	BURFORD CAPITAL, LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Burford Capital Limited
Role	Plaintiff

Name	CBOCS Distribution
Role	Plaintiff

Name	CKE Restaurants Holdings
Role	Plaintiff

Name	COLUMBIA MEATS
Role	Plaintiff

Name	CAESARS ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Cracker Barrel Old Country Store
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Darden Restaurants
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Wayne Deshotel
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Jonas Dimas
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Direct-Action Plaintiffs
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Domino's Pizza Distribution LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Domino's Pizza LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Don Chavas Mexican Restaurant
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Joe Christiana Food Distributors
Role	Plaintiff

Name	John Gross and Company
Role	Plaintiff

Name	John Soules Acquisitions LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	John Soules Foods
Role	Plaintiff

Name	KJ 2019 Holdings
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Kraft Heinz Foods Company
Role	Plaintiff

Name	L. Hart
Role	Plaintiff

Name	LTP Management Group
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Gloria J. Lathen
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Jason Liebich
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Joshua Madsen
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Sabrina Majernik
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Maplevale Farms
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Maximum Quality
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Maximum Quality Foods
Role	Plaintiff

Name	McDonald's Coporation
Role	Plaintiff

Name	McLane Company
Role	Plaintiff

Name	MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Meijer
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Mission Valley Wings
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Steve Mizera
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Dorothy Monahan
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Dorothy Monohan
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Mookie's Southern Cuisine LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Christopher Nelson
Role	Plaintiff

Name	NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY
Role	Plaintiff

Name	NESTLE USA, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Tracy Newman
Role	Plaintiff

Name	OSI Restaurant Partners
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Oceanside Wings
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Ollivets Investments Limited
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Ontario Wings
Role	Plaintiff

Name	PJ Food Service
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Pacific Agri-Products
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Jennifer Wallace
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Wings Over Long Beach
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Winn-Dixie Stores
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Wood-Fruitticher Grocery Company
Role	Plaintiff

Name	WOODMAN'S FOOD MARKET, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Zaxby's Franchising LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Glaz LLC
Role	Respondent

Name	CHICK-FIL-A, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	COLORADO BOXED BEEF CO.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Commercial and Institutional Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs
Role	Plaintiff

Name	KRISPY KRUNCHY FOODS, L.L.C.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Merchants Distributors
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Carmen Ocasio
Role	Plaintiff

Name	ACR Foster Intermediate Group LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	THE KROGER CO.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Amy Veaner
Role	Plaintiff

Name	ACR Group Foster Holdings LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	SYSCO CORPORATION
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Daniel M. Percy
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Poultry Products of Connecticut
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Sam's East
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Sam's West
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Sargent's
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Catherine Senkle
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Services Group of America
Role	Plaintiff

Name	SHERWOOD FOOD DISTRIBUTORS, L.L.C.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Target Corporation
Role	Plaintiff

Name	THE CHEESECAKE FACTORY INCORPORATED
Role	Plaintiff

Name	The Fresh Market
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Track 1 Direct Action Plaintiffs
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Track 1 Plaintiffs
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Track 2 DAPs
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Troyer Foods
Role	Plaintiff

Name	US Foods
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Unified Grocers
Role	Plaintiff

Name	United States of America
Role	Plaintiff

Name	United Supermarkets
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Christopher Vallaro
Role	Plaintiff

Name	W. Lee Flowers & Co.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	WAL-MART STORES EAST
Role	Plaintiff

Name	WSE Investment
Role	Plaintiff

Name	WZ Franchise Corporation
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Wal-Mart Stores Arkansas
Role	Plaintiff

Name	WALMART INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	S. Robson Walton
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Jim C. Walton
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Alice L. Walton
Role	Plaintiff

Name	WALTON ENTERPRISES, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	John T Walton Estate Trust
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Walton Family Holdings Trust
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Wawa
Role	Plaintiff

Name	WeLoveCaesar LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Leslie Weidner
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Weinstein Wholesale Meats
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Western Boxed Meat Distributors
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Whatabrands LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Whataburger Restaurants LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	WHITE CASTLE PURCHASING CO.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Kenosha Investments LP
Role	Respondent

Name	Posen Investments LP
Role	Respondent

Name	R.W. Zant Co.
Role	Respondent

Name	Maura R. Grossman
Role	Special Master

Name	Jayson Penn
Role	Unknown

Name	Agri Stats
Role	Defendant

Name	Mar-Jac Holdings
Role	Defendant

Name	Mountainaire Farms
Role	Defendant

Name	Norman W. Fries
Role	Defendant

Name	Mar-Jac Poultry AL
Role	Defendant

Name	Mar-Jac Poultry MS
Role	Defendant

Name	O.K. Industries
Role	Defendant

Name	George's Farms
Role	Defendant

Name	GEORGE'S, INC.
Role	Defendant

Name	Harrison Poultry
Role	Defendant

Name	House of Raeford Farms
Role	Defendant

Name	JCG Foods of Alabama
Role	Defendant

Name	JCG Foods of Georgia
Role	Defendant

Name	Keystone Foods Corporation
Role	Defendant

Name	Keystone Foods LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	KOCH FOODS LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	Mar-Jac AL/MS
Role	Defendant

Name	Tyson Breeders
Role	Defendant

Name	AMIGOS MEAT & POULTRY, L.L.C.
Role	Movant

Name	Amigos Meat Distributors East
Role	Movant

Name	Amigos Meat Distributors West
Role	Movant

Name	Amigos Meat Distributors
Role	Movant

Name	Gerber's Poultry
Role	Movant

Name	Glaz LLC
Role	Movant

Name	Shiyang Huang
Role	Movant

Name	Kenosha Investments LP
Role	Movant

Name	Latina Boulevard Foods
Role	Movant

Name	Jayson Penn
Role	Movant

Name	Porky Products
Role	Movant

Name	Posen Investments LP
Role	Movant

Name	QUIRCH FOODS CO.
Role	Movant

Name	Shamrock Foods Company
Role	Movant

Name	Rabobank US Financial Corporation
Role	Defendant

Name	Track 1 Defendants
Role	Defendant

Name	Walnut Sycamore NewCo LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	Wayne Farms Holdings LLC
Role	Defendant

Name	Wayne Farms
Role	Defendant

Name	William Wade Lovette
Role	deponent

Name	The NPD Group
Role	deponent

Name	Jayson Penn
Role	Intervenor

Name	Timothy Stiller
Role	Intervenor

Name	United States of America
Role	Intervenor

Name	The Distribution Group
Role	Movant

Name	The Golub Corporation
Role	Movant

Name	AHOLD DELHAIZE USA, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Alex Lee
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Alpine Special Treatment Center
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Amory Investments LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Cajun Operating Company d/b/a Church's Chicken
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Campbell Soup Supply Company L.L.C.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Captain D's
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Carina Ventures LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	CARL BUDDIG AND COMPANY
Role	Plaintiff

Name	CEDAR FARMS, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Certco
Role	Plaintiff

Name	CHECKERS DRIVE-IN RESTAURANTS, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Cheney Bros.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Linda Cheslow
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Costco Warehouse
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Downtown Wings
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Abraham Drucker
Role	Plaintiff

Name	EMA Foods Co.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	El Pollo Loco
Role	Plaintiff

Name	End-User Consumer Plaintiffs
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Andrew Evans
Role	Plaintiff

Name	FIC Restaurants
Role	Plaintiff

Name	FAREWAY STORES, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Fargo Stopping Center LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Feeser's Inc.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Ferraro Foods of North Carolina
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Ferraro Foods
Role	Plaintiff

Name	James Flasch
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Focus Brands LLC
Role	Plaintiff

Name	GREENVILLE MEATS
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Vern Gardner
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Gaslamp Wings
Role	Plaintiff

Name	GIANT EAGLE CORPORATION
Role	Plaintiff

Name	GIBSON INCORPORATED
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Christopher Gilbert
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Glazier Foods Company
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Jonathan Glover
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Christopher G Glover
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Golden Tree Restaurants
Role	Plaintiff

Name	HARVEST MEAT COMPANY, INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Hooters of America
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Independent Purchasing Cooperative
Role	Plaintiff

Name	Amick-OSI Processing
Role	Defendant

Name	BBSB Investments
Role	Defendant

Name	Case Farms Processing
Role	Defendant

Name	Koch Meats Co.
Role	Defendant

Name	SSMCDANIEL INC.
Role	Plaintiff

Opinions

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-0
Date	2017-08-07
Notes	Order Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 8/7/2017: For the reasons stated in the attached Order, Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel the Deposition of Defendant Foster Farms, LLC 405 is granted in part and denied in part. Mailed notice(lxs, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-1
Date	2017-09-28
Notes	ORDER concerning production of the Florida Attorney General documents. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 9/28/2017. Mailed notice(ber, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-2
Date	2017-11-13
Notes	ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached Order, Defendants' Motion to Stay Production Obligations Imposed by Plaintiffs' Subpoenas Served on Third Parties 499 is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 11/13/2017. Mailed notice (ber, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-3
Date	2017-11-20
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motions to dismiss, R. 279; R. 292 are denied except that Plaintiffs' claims under the laws of Wisconsin are dismissed, such that Defendants' motion to dismiss the Indirect Plaintiffs' claim is granted in part. The Court has not addressed all of Defendants' arguments seeking dismissal of Plaintiffs' state law claims. But the Court's opinion explains that at least one claim in each jurisdiction will proceed to discovery, with the exception of Wisconsin. Any state law claim the Court has addressed and dismissed, is dismissed without prejudice.To the extent Plaintiffs believe they can cure the deficiencies the Court has described with respect to their claims under Wisconsin law, Plaintiffs may file a joint motion for leave to amend by December 20, 2017, supported by a brief of no more than five pages explaining how the amendments would cure Plaintiffs' allegations. The proposed amended paragraphs of the complaints (not the entire complaints) should also be attached as an exhibit. No defendant should file a responding brief unless the Court so orders.To the extent it is necessary in order to streamline a trial or assess damages for the Court to address the additional state law claims not addressed in this opinion, or to reconsider dismissal of state law claims under the laws of jurisdictions for which other claims are proceeding, the Court will address those issues when appropriate. For now, however, the parties know which jurisdictions remain in play and which are out. That is a sufficient basis to conduct discovery. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 11/20/2017:Mailed notice(srn, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-4
Date	2017-12-22
Notes	ORDER: Early this year, the parties issued initial sets of Rule 34 requests for production of documents. The parties have since responded and objected to each other's requests for production, and they met and conferred about those responses and objections. Then, in several status reports and letters, the parties identified and briefed certain disputes regarding the Rule 34 requests for production (and the responses and objections thereto). See [415 at 3352; 429; 434; 506; 507; 508; 522; 523; 524; 526]. During a telephonic status hearing held on December 11, 2017, the parties stated that a few of those disputes remain outstanding and are now ripe for ruling. In this Order, the Court rules on several of those disputes. See attached Order for further details. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 12/22/2017. Mailed notice(ber, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-5
Date	2018-02-21
Notes	MEMORANDUM Order: For all of the reasons set forth in the Court's Memorandum Order, the Court finds, at least at this time and on this record, that Defendants are not entitled to the extensive downstream discovery they now seek through the general and broad requests for production of documents that Defendants have served on DPPs and CIIPPs. The Court's ruling is limited to the requests for production, arguments, and record now before the Court. The Court is not now holding that all downstream discovery of any type or form would be beyond the scope of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. That means this ruling is without prejudice to Defendants' ability to potentially better define what they are looking for from a particul the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 2/21/2018. Mailed notice(ber, )ar plaintiff group and the relevance of and need for that information, and it also is without prejudice to Plaintiffs' ability to better articulate the burden of producing that information. If this issue arises again or is rejuvenated, though, the parties must first meet and confer about any modification to Defendants' discovery requests and Plaintiffs' responses thereto before they bring the issue before the Court. See attached Memorandum Order for further details. Signed by
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-6
Date	2018-04-13
Notes	ORDER: Tyson Defendants' Motion for Protective Order to Preclude Non-Parties' Production of Documents as to Non-Custodians 725 is denied without prejudice. See attached Statement for further details. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 4/13/2018. Mailed notice (ber, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-7
Date	2018-07-12
Notes	is granted. See attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 7/12/2018. Mailed notice(ber, ) MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce the Court's February 21, 2018 Order and for Protective Order Regarding Downstream Discovery [ECF No. 879]
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-8
Date	2018-07-17
Notes	[ECF No. 976] is denied. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 7/17/2018. Mailed notice(ber, )ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Class Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Attachments to Responsive Email Families and Modify the ESI Protocol Order (ECF No. 459) [ECF No. 976]. In this Motion, Plaintiffs challenge the actions of three Defendants (Tyson, Koch Foods, and Mountaire) in withholding from production a large number of email attachments as non-responsive. For the reasons set forth in the attached Order, Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel and Modify ESI Protocol
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-9
Date	2018-07-26
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Agri Stats's Motion for Protective Order 894 is denied. The Court finds that Agri Stats's request for a protective order that would exempt it from performing EUCPs' proposed custodial searches of ESI for a significant portion of the time frame for discovery in this case is not justified. EUCPs and Agri Stats, however, shall continue to meet and confer in a continuing effort to accommodate Agri Stats's concerns about burden and cost without unorandum Opinion and Order. - Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 7/26/2018. [For further details see order] Mailed notice (np, )duly impairing EUCPs' legitimate requests for discovery in this case. If the parties reach impasse on particular issues, they can bring those issues back to this Court or to the Special Master, depending upon the issue, consistent with this Mem
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-10
Date	2019-02-28
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For these reasons, Agri Stats's motion to dismiss 804 is denied. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 2/28/2019:Mailed notice(srn, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-11
Date	2019-12-09
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Fieldale's motion to enforce the settlement agreement against Winn-Dixie and to dismiss Winn-Dixie claims 2670 is granted. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 12/9/2019:Mailed notice(srn, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-12
Date	2019-12-27
Notes	MEMORANDUM ORDER signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 12/27/2019. For the reasons listed in the attached Memorandum Order, Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order to Protect Class Members from Misleading Solicitation [ECF 2331] is granted in part, denied in part, and denied without prejudice in part as to any corrective notice. Mailed notice(sxw, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-13
Date	2020-03-03
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: More than two years ago, the Court denied motions to dismiss claims under the Sherman Act § 1, finding that the allegations plausibly demonstrated collusive agreement among Defendants. The allegations of collusive manipulation of the Georgia Dock are even stronger. Therefore, Sanderson's motion to dismiss 2920 is denied. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 3/3/2020:Mailed notice(srn, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-14
Date	2020-03-04
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Therefore, the DOJ's and Defendants' motions 3432 3434 are granted. This decision is in no way intended to imply that supplemental document production is foreclosed. Document production should continue as it has under Judge Gilbert's supervision. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 3/4/2020:Mailed notice(srn, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-15
Date	2020-06-25
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Class Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of an Order Regarding Remote Depositions of Certain Categories of Witnesses [ECF No. 3610] ("Class Plaintiffs' Motion") is granted in large part for the reasons explained in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. A telephonic hearing is set for July 20, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. for the purpose of addressing the matters set forth in Section II of this Memorandum Opinion and Order, and any other issues the parties may wish to raise relating to the taking of remote depositions. By July 15, 2020, the parties shall file an agreed remote deposition protocol and note any remaining disagreements about the terms of such a protocol in that filing. By the same date, Class Plaintiffs also shall submit a timetable for taking the 18 depositions they say they want to take afterconsultation about that timetable with Defendants and DAPs. Class Plaintiffs should note any disagreements among the parties about their proposed deposition schedule in that submission. If these dates chosen unilaterally by the Court do not work for the parties, liaison counsel should send an email to the Court's courtroom deputy proposing different dates. See attached Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 6/25/2020. Mailed notice(ber, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-16
Date	2020-07-15
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Defendants' motion to dismiss is denied in part and granted in part.3159 The motion is denied to the extent that Puerto Rico's claims based on its direct purchases from Defendants may proceed. The motion is granted to the extent that Puerto Rico's claims based on indirect purchases, its unjust enrichment claims, and its claims parens patriae, are dismissed. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 7/15/2020:Mailed notice(srn, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-17
Date	2020-07-29
Notes	o. 3570]. For the reasons discussed, All Plaintiffs' Motion [ECF No. 3570] is granted in part. See attached Statement for further details. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 7/29/2020. Mailed notice(ber, )ORDER: This matter is before the Court on All Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Court's August 28, 2018 Order (Doc. 1155) and Scheduling Order No. 13 (Doc. 3420) to Permit Limited Evidentiary Discovery After the Fact Discovery Deadline [ECF N
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-18
Date	2020-09-22
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Defendants' motions 3687 3745 are denied in part and granted in part. Plaintiffs' motion to compel 3672 is denied. See order for further details. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 9/22/2020. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-19
Date	2021-06-01
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Rabobank's motion to dismiss 4369 is granted. The claims against Rabobank are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 6/1/2021. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-20
Date	2021-11-30
Notes	n on 11/30/2021. Mailed notice. (ecw, )MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the attached order, Appointed Counsel's motion 4550 is granted as follows: (1) expenses are awarded in the amount of $4.5 million; (2) incentive awards in the amount of $15,000 are awarded to each of the five class representatives; and (3) fees are awarded in the amount of $55,228,866.70, which is one third of the settlement fund after deducting the expenses and incentive awards. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durki
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-21
Date	2021-12-01
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the attached order, Appointed Counsel's motion 4550 is granted as follows: (1) expenses are awarded in the amount of $4.5 million; (2) incentive awards in the amount of $15,000 are awarded to each of the five class representatives; and (3) fees are awarded in the amount of $55,008,866.67, which is one third of the settlement fund after deducting the expenses and incentive awards. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 12/1/2021, nunc pro tunc to 11/30/2021. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-22
Date	2022-01-19
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For all the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, DAPs' Motion to Set Schedule for Defendants' Responses to Contention Interrogatories [ECF No. 4732] is denied, and DAPs are not given leave to serve any new interrogatories at this time. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 1/19/2022. Mailed notice(ber, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-23
Date	2022-02-16
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, Bojangles' Restaurants, Inc. and Bojangles OPCO, LLC's Motion to Compel 30(b)(6) Deposition of Cheney [ECF No. 4932] is denied. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 2/16/2022. Mailed notice(ber, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-24
Date	2022-03-03
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order, Certain Direct Action Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Mountaire Employee Bruce Mooney as a Document Custodian (ECF No. 4738) is denied. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 3/3/2022. Mailed notice (ber, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-25
Date	2022-04-29
Notes	cw, )MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the motion for entry of final judgment 5441 is granted. The Court finds there is no just reason for delay and enters final judgment in favor of defendants Utrecht-America Holdings, Inc., Rabo AgriFinance LLC, Rabobank USA Financial Corporation, Utrecht-America Finance Co., and Coperatieve Rabobank, U.A., New York Branch. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 4/29/2022. Mailed notice. (e
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-26
Date	2022-05-27
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiffs' motions to certify classes of direct purchasers 3962, indirect purchasers 3968, and end user consumers 3971 are granted, and Defendants' motions to exclude the opinions of Carter 4272, Mangum 4262, and Sunding 4281 are denied. Lastly, the End Users supported their motions with expert opinions from Dr. Luis Cabral and Cameron R. Azari, Esq. Cabral offered opinions about whether Agri Stats served to promote anticompetitive "information exchanges." Azari offered opinions about "whether it would be possible to identify end-user consumers who purchased class products in grocery stores and other retailers." While helpful, and likely relevant to summary judgment and/or trial, the Court found their opinions unnecessary to determining whether the Consumer class should be certified. Thus, Defendants' motions to exclude their testimony 4287 4245 are denied without prejudice. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 5/27/2022. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-27
Date	2022-06-23
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons discussed in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, Costco Wholesale Corporation's ("Costco") Motion and Memorandum in Support to Permit Costco's Compliance with Document Subpoena and Request for Expedited Ruling (ECF No. 5650) is denied. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 6/23/2022. Mailed notice(ber, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-28
Date	2022-08-05
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Defendants' motions "to allow witness testimony in Track 1" 5664 5667 are granted in accordance with the attached order. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 8/5/2022. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-29
Date	2022-10-07
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order, Appointed Counsel's motion 5160 is granted as follows: (1) expenses are awarded in the amount of $8.75 million; (2) incentive awards in the amount of $2,000 are awarded to each of the 24 class representatives, with a twenty-fifth $2,000 award being shared by class representatives David and Leslie Weidner; and (3) attorney's fees are awarded in the amount of $57,400,000.00, which is 33 percent of the settlement fund after deducting the expenses and incentive awards. Lastly, while the Court appreciates the spirit of the objections, including the most recent filing of October 6, 2022, see R. 5836, they were not material to a case of this size, alleging antitrust violations, subject to Seventh Circuit precedent, so no objector "incentive award" is appropriate. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 10/7/2022. Mailed notice. (ecw, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-30
Date	2022-11-30
Notes	MEMORANDUM Order: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum Order, Non-Party Roger Austin's Motion to Quash Subpoena [ECF No. 5789] is denied. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 11/30/2022. Mailed notice (ber, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-31
Date	2023-06-30
Notes	and granted in part. Defendants' joint motion by certain defendants for "summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds," 5966 is denied. Defendants' joint motion for "partial summary judgment as to overarching conspiracy claims," 5901 is granted. The motion by certain defendants for "partial summary judgment on all Track 1 plaintiffs' claims alleging a 'Georgia Dock conspiracy,'" 5527 is granted. The motion by certain defendants MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum Opinion and Order, Defendants' joint motion for "summary judgment concerning alleged agreement to restrict broiler supply," 5996 6033 is denied in partorder negates the need for a decision on that motion, or otherwise alter their plans for pursuing or defending the case. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 6/30/2023. Mailed notice. (ecw, )for "summary judgment dismissing Track 1 plaintiffs' Georgia Dock claims," 5878 is granted. Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment on three affirmative defenses, 5869 5870 is denied as moot. Defendants' Daubert motions 5938 5892 5885 5862 5896 5910 5865 5891 5897 5929 are denied as to the issues addressed in this order, and denied without prejudice to raising in a motion in limine with respect to all other issues. The following motions by individual defendants are denied: Harrison 5866; Keystone 5936; Koch 6006; Mountaire 5886; OK Foods 5879 5880; Peco 5912; Pilgrim's 5893; Raeford 5935; Sanderson 5990; Simmons 5890; and Tyson 5991. The following motions by individual defendants regarding Plaintiffs' Sherman Act and RICO claims are granted: Agri Stats 5899; Case 5926; Fieldale 5848; Foster 5876; Fries-Claxton 5915; Perdue 5987; and Wayne 5851. Defendants' joint motion for "summary judgment dismissing track 1 plaintiffs' state law claims" 5846 is granted in part and reserved in part. The DAP's motion to exclude portions of certain Defendants' economists' opinions 5914 is denied without prejudice to refiling as a motion in limine. The Court is aware that the Track Two motion to dismiss is pending. The Court will address it in due course. However, the parties should inform the Court promptly if any of the findings in this opinion and
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-32
Date	2023-08-15
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Therefore, Defendants' motion is granted in part, denied in part, and reserved in part. The motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to Plaintiffs' claims under the consumer protection of statutes of Minnesota, Nevada, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Vermont, and the Indirects' Utah claim. The motion is reserved with respect to the unjust enrichment claims. The motion is denied in all other respects. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 8/15/2023. Mailed notice. (kp, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-33
Date	2023-10-13
Notes	MOTION by Defendants Sanderson Farm Foods, LLC (f/k/a Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Foods Division)), Sanderson Farms Processing, LLC (f/k/a Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Processing Division)), Sanderson Farms Production, LLC (f/k/a Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Production Division)), Sanderson Farms, LLC (f/k/a Sanderson Farms, Inc.) for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50. Presented before District Judge (Ondeck, Christopher)
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-34
Date	2023-10-23
Notes	MOTION by Plaintiff Track 1 Plaintiffs for judgment as a Matter of Law Presented before District Judge (Bruckner, W.)
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-08637-35
Date	2023-11-02
Notes	AMENDED MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Amending order 6641, amended pursuant to stipulation 6903. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 11/2/2023. Mailed notice. (kp, )
View	View File

USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-09179

Judicial Publications

35:271 Patent Infringement

Patent

Collection	United States Courts Opinions
SuDoc	JU 4.15
Court Type	District
Court Name	United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
Circuit	7th
Office Location	Chicago
Case Type	civil

Parties

Name	OIL-DRI CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Role	Counter Defendant

Name	NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY
Role	Defendant

Name	OIL-DRI CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Role	Plaintiff

Name	NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY
Role	Counter Claimant

Opinions

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-09179-0
Date	2017-04-24
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 4/24/2017. The Court grants Oil-Dri's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 30. Nestle's Counterclaims III-VI are dismissed without prejudice. If Nestle cannot file amended counterclaims with facts that support its allegations on or before 5/22/17, these counterclaims will be dismissed with prejudice. Further, for the above reasons the Court denies Oil-Dri's Motion to Compel and Motion for a Protective Order 39. Mailed notice(lk, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_16-cv-09179-1
Date	2017-05-09
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 5/9/2017. The Court construes Nestle's motions as motions to compel. The Court grants Nestle's Motions to Strike for Oil-Dri's Assertion of Alleged Induced Infringement 55, Attempt to Claim an Earlier Priority Date 60, 70, and Initial and First Revised Infringement Contentions 80, and Oil-Dri has 21 days from the entry of this Order to amend and disclose their Revised Initial Contentions consistent with Order. The Court denies Nestle's Motions to Strike for Oil-Dri's Addition of Alleged Use of Purported Invention 58. Mailed notice(lk, )
View	View File

USCOURTS-ilnd-1_15-cv-01067

Judicial Publications

35:271 Patent Infringement

Patent

Collection	United States Courts Opinions
SuDoc	JU 4.15
Court Type	District
Court Name	United States District Court Northern District of Illinois
Circuit	7th
Office Location	Chicago
Case Type	civil

Parties

Name	NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY
Role	Counter Claimant

Name	NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY
Role	Defendant

Name	OIL-DRI CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Role	Plaintiff

Name	GRAIN PROCESSING CORPORATION
Role	Respondent

Name	OIL-DRI CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Role	Counter Defendant

Opinions

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_15-cv-01067-0
Date	2017-03-31
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 3/31/2017:Mailed notice(kef, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_15-cv-01067-1
Date	2017-08-02
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: The Court grants in part and denies in part Oil-Dri's motion to exclude, by Inter Partes Review estoppel, certain invalidity contentions 114. See Memorandum Opinion and Order for further details. Signed by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 8/2/2017. Mailed notice(ep, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_15-cv-01067-2
Date	2018-02-26
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 2/26/2018:Mailed notice(kef, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_15-cv-01067-3
Date	2018-06-09
Notes	MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 6/9/2018: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court denies plaintiff's motion to exclude certain prior art defenses [dkt. 198] but directs defendant to serve a revised set of invalidity and unenforceability contentions consistent with this order by no later than July 3, 2018. (mk)
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_15-cv-01067-4
Date	2018-06-26
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier on 6/26/2018. Mailed notice. (jj, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_15-cv-01067-5
Date	2018-09-05
Notes	MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 9/5/2018: The disputed claim terms are construed in accordance with the conclusions set forth in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Court sets a status hearing for September 13, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. and will set at that time a schedule for all remaining proceedings. (mk)
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_15-cv-01067-6
Date	2018-10-15
Notes	MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier on 10/15/2018. Mailed notice. (jj, )
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_15-cv-01067-7
Date	2018-12-21
Notes	ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND FINAL INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE DEFENDANT'S WITNESS WALTER CLARK, signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 12/21/2018: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Order, the Court denies plaintiff's motion to amend its final infringement contentions and grants plaintiff's motion to exclude defendant's witness Walter Clark. (mk)
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_15-cv-01067-8
Date	2019-02-22
Notes	MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 2/22/2019: The Court grants in part and denies in part both Oil-Dri's and Nestle Purina's motions for summary judgment [600, 621], as follows. The Court denies both sides' motions for summary judgment on the question of literal infringement of claim 1 of the patent in suit, except as to the Maricopa products, on which the Court grants Nestle Purina's cross-motion. The Court also denies both parties' motions for summary judgment on Nestle Purina's prior art defenses. The Court grants Oil-Dri's motion for summary judgment on Nestle Purina's written description and equitable estoppel defenses. Finally, the Court denies Oil-Dri's motion for summary judgment of literal infringement of claim 30 and grants Nestle Purina's cross-motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of that claim. (mk) (Kennelly, Matthew)
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_15-cv-01067-9
Date	2019-03-08
Notes	MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (regarding certain motions in limine and Daubert motions) signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 3/8/2019. (mk)
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_15-cv-01067-10
Date	2019-03-25
Notes	MOTION by Defendant Nestle Purina Petcare Company for judgment Rule 50(A) as a Matter of Law (Abernathy, Michael)
View	View File

Opinion ID	USCOURTS-ilnd-1_15-cv-01067-11
Date	2019-03-25
Notes	MOTION by Defendant Nestle Purina Petcare Company for judgment Rule 50(A) as a Matter of Law [CORRECTED] (Abernathy, Michael)
View	View File

Date of last update: 28 Apr 2025

Sources: Illinois Office of the Secretary of State

NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY

Company Details

Agent

President

Secretary

Assumed Names

Historical Names

Shares

Mines

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Court Cases

Court Cases Opinions

Related by officers

Related by address